Toyota RAV4 2015 vs Honda CR-V 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 4.9 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2015: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantly between the front and rear wheels to enhance cornering performance by sending up to 50 percent of engine power to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated when driving below 40 km/h (25 mph) and provides constant four-wheel drive. Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2015 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2015 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1110 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 400 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |