Toyota RAV4 2015 vs Jeep Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 271 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 125 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 128 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 412 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |