Toyota RAV4 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 2 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 13 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota RAV4 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 497 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |