Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota RAV4
2010 - 2013
Volvo XC60
2008 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.42.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 150 - 177 HP163 - 285 HP
Torque: 198 - 400 NM300 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 - 11 seconds7.5 - 10.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.0 - 9.66.0 - 11.9
Toyota RAV4 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Toyota RAV4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 182 - 191 mm (7.2 - 7.5 inches)230 mm (9.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.63 m
Width: 1.83 m1.89 m
Height: 1.71 m1.71 m
Toyota RAV4 is smaller.
Toyota RAV4 is 24 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 586 litres495 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1752 litres1455 litres
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 91 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 297 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters12.1 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`137~ 2`499
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 98009400
Pros and Cons: Toyota RAV4 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Volvo XC60 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv