Toyota RAV4 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 177 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 198 - 400 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota RAV4. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.6 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Toyota RAV4 petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Toyota RAV4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 182 - 191 mm (7.2 - 7.5 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 24 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1752 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 297 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`137 kg | ~ 2`499 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`611 kg | ~ 1`814 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 526 kg | ~ 685 kg | |
| Toyota RAV4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |