Toyota Corolla 2013 vs Mercedes C class 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 306 HP | |
Torque: | 173 NM | 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 6 seconds | |
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla engine produces 166 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 197 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Corolla) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes C class engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Yaris | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes CLS, Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Toyota Corolla 2013 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise.
One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Corolla 2013 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Corolla is 3 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Corolla is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 475 litres | |
Mercedes C class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Corolla has 23 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. This could mean that the Toyota Corolla uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`125 | |
Safety: | |||
The Mercedes C class scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 7800 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |