Toyota Corolla 2010 vs Mazda 3 2011

 
Toyota Corolla
2010 - 2013
Mazda 3
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 124 HP150 HP
Torque: 157 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds10.6 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Toyota Corolla engine produces 26 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.27.6
Toyota Corolla consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway940 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 3 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 19 years13 years
Engine spread: Used also on Toyota AurisInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Toyota Corolla engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6 engine: This engine is considered one of the most reliable in its class and, with proper maintenance, does not cause major issues for owners. However, its performance is rather modest. The timing chain has a ...  More about Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6 engine 

Mazda 3 2011 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.54 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Corolla is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres430 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Corolla has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7851`820
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 50005200
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 3 has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • longer expected engine lifespan
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv