Toyota Corolla 2010 vs Mazda 3 2010

 
Toyota Corolla
2010 - 2013
Mazda 3
2010 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Diesel
Petrol engines (Toyota Corolla) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mazda 3) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 124 HP109 HP
Torque: 157 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds11 seconds
Toyota Corolla is more dynamic to drive.
Toyota Corolla engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 3, but torque is 113 NM less than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.94.4
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Toyota Corolla consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 375 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 790 km in combined cycle1240 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1410 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6 engine: This engine is considered one of the most reliable in its class and, with proper maintenance, does not cause major issues for owners. However, its performance is rather modest. The timing chain has a ...  More about Toyota Corolla 2010 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.54 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Corolla is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 450 litres430 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Corolla has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7851`815
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 42003200
Pros and Cons: Toyota Corolla has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv