Toyota Corolla 2010 vs Honda Civic 2012
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 HP | 99 HP | |
Torque: | 132 NM | 127 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
Toyota Corolla is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla engine produces 2 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Civic engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 17 years | 24 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | Used also on Honda Jazz | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Toyota Corolla engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Toyota Corolla 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Corolla 2010 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.54 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
Toyota Corolla is 24 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 477 litres | |
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Corolla has 27 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. This could mean that the Toyota Corolla uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.08 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.68 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Honda Civic has
| |