Toyota Corolla 2007 vs Mercedes C class 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla engine produces 68 HP less power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 103 NM less than Mercedes C class. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Corolla) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes C class engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Auris | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Corolla 2007 1.6 engine: This engine is considered one of the most reliable in its class and, with proper maintenance, does not cause major issues for owners. However, its performance is rather modest.
The timing chain has a ... More about Toyota Corolla 2007 1.6 engine Mercedes C klase 2004 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes C klase 2004 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla is larger. Toyota Corolla is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`785 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.1/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |