Toyota Corolla 2000 vs Mazda 3 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla is smaller. Toyota Corolla is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Corolla has 24 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Corolla has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |