Toyota Corolla 2000 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Mitsubishi Carisma. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.2 | |
| Toyota Corolla consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Carisma might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla is smaller. Toyota Corolla is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 437 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 460 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has more luggage space. Toyota Corolla has 23 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |