Toyota Corolla 2001 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla engine produces 19 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Corolla consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Auris | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Celica | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Carina E might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.41 m | |
| Toyota Corolla is 16 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Toyota Corolla has 3 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 200 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |