Toyota Corolla 1997 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 16.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.1 | |
| Toyota Corolla consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Lancer engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Corolla is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |