Toyota Corolla 1997 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 141 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla engine produces 6 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, but torque is 4 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Corolla consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Celica | Used also on Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Corolla is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`025 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |