Toyota Corolla 1997 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla engine produces 3 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, but torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Corolla consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Corolla is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`615 | 1`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |