Toyota Corolla 2002 vs Suzuki Baleno 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla engine produces 14 HP more power than Suzuki Baleno, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Suzuki Baleno. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Baleno might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| Toyota Corolla and Suzuki Baleno are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Baleno has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |