Toyota Corolla 1999 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Toyota Corolla engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mazda 323. Despite the higher power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Corolla consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla is larger. Toyota Corolla is 28 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 372 litres | 309 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage capacity. Toyota Corolla has 63 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 323 has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |