Toyota Corolla 2000 vs Honda Civic 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 143 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Toyota Corolla is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla engine produces 5 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 7 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite less power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.1 | |
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Corolla consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
760 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.39 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Corolla is 3 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`620 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Honda Civic has
| |