Toyota Corolla 2019 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Toyota Corolla and Toyota C-HR have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.9 | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Corolla consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.56 m | |
| Toyota Corolla is 2 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Corolla is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 377 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`615 kg | 1`865 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`310 kg | 1`390 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 305 kg | 475 kg | |
| Toyota Corolla load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 56 procentiem less than Toyota C-HR. Therefore, Toyota C-HR is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |