Toyota Corolla 2019 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Toyota Corolla and Toyota C-HR have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Corolla consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.56 m | |
| Toyota Corolla is 2 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Corolla is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 377 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`605 kg | 1`845 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`300 kg | 1`375 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 305 kg | 470 kg | |
| Toyota Corolla load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 54 procentiem less than Toyota C-HR. Therefore, Toyota C-HR is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 600 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |