Toyota Corolla 2018 vs Volvo V60 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Corolla) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo V60) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Corolla engine produces 2 HP more power than Volvo V60, but torque is 130 NM less than Volvo V60. Thanks to more power Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1710 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
| Toyota Corolla is 2 cm longer than the Volvo V60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 581 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1591 litres | 1241 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage capacity. Toyota Corolla has 151 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Corolla (by 350 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V60, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`910 kg | 2`200 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`465 kg | 1`648 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 445 kg | 552 kg | |
| Toyota Corolla load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Volvo V60. Therefore, Volvo V60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Volvo V60 has
| |