Toyota Corolla 2016 vs Volvo S60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Corolla) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo S60) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 132 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Corolla engine produces 31 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 240 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Corolla could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Corolla consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 125 mm (4.9 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo S60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Volvo S60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Toyota Corolla 2016 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine most frequently report excessive oil consumption. The timing chain has a relatively short lifespan, with many owners needing to replace it between 150,000 and 200,000 km. ... More about Toyota Corolla 2016 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla is smaller. Toyota Corolla is 1 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 452 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1749 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Corolla has 72 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`775 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |