Toyota Corolla 2003 vs Mercedes C class 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Toyota Corolla is available only with front wheel drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 131 HP | 115 - 354 HP | |
Torque: | 130 - 215 NM | 185 - 540 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | 5.2 - 12.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.8 | 6.1 - 11.5 | |
Toyota Corolla petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, Toyota Corolla equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
Toyota Corolla is smaller, but higher. Toyota Corolla is 15 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`676 | ~ 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |