Toyota Corolla 2003 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 131 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 - 215 NM | 145 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | 9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.8 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Toyota Corolla petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Toyota Corolla equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota Corolla is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Corolla is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 473 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Corolla has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`676 | ~ 1`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |