Toyota Corolla 1997 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 - 110 HP | 68 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 145 NM | 108 - 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 16.1 seconds | 7.6 - 16.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 8.7 | 6.1 - 7.9 | |
|
Toyota Corolla petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. On average, Toyota Corolla equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Corolla is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`609 | ~ 1`019 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |