Toyota Corolla 1997 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.3 - 2.0 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 72 - 110 HP | 72 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 120 - 145 NM | 120 - 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 16.1 seconds | 10.2 - 16.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 8.7 | 6.3 - 8.7 | |
Toyota Corolla 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla 1997. On average, Toyota Corolla 1997 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla 1997. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Corolla 1997 is 3 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla 1997, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 372 litres | 390 litres | |
Toyota Corolla 1997 has 18 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla 1997. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`608 | ~ 1`609 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |