Toyota Camry 2001 vs Jaguar S-Type 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar S-Type is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Camry engine produces 88 HP less power than Jaguar S-Type, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Jaguar S-Type. Due to the lower power, Toyota Camry reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 11.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Camry is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Camry consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type, which means that by driving the Toyota Camry over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Camry consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Camry gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Camry) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar S-Type) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Previa | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar X-Type, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Camry might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Camry 2001 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Toyota Camry is smaller, but higher. Toyota Camry is 4 cm shorter than the Jaguar S-Type, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Camry is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Camry is 1.1 metres less than that of the Jaguar S-Type, which means Toyota Camry can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Camry has
|
Jaguar S-Type has
| |