Toyota Camry 2017 vs Opel Omega 2001
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Hybrid | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Toyota Camry) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (Opel Omega), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 176 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Toyota Camry engine produces 26 HP more power than Opel Omega, but torque is 79 NM less than Opel Omega. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.5 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 18.90 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 49 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Camry gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Camry) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 127 mm (5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Omega can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Omega version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Toyota Camry is 2 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Camry is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 493 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 830 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Toyota Camry has 37 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Camry is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Toyota Camry can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`190 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Camry has
|
Opel Omega has
| |