Toyota Camry 2009 vs Chevrolet Epica 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Petrol engines (Toyota Camry) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Chevrolet Epica) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 179 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 232 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Toyota Camry engine produces 29 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, but torque is 88 NM less than Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.6 | |
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Camry consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Camry could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
Chevrolet Epica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 530'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Epica engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 17 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus ES | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Opel Antara, Chevrolet Cruze | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Toyota Camry 2009 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota Camry 2009 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Camry is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Camry is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 480 litres | |
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Camry has 70 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Toyota Camry uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Camry is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Camry has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |