Toyota Camry 2009 vs Chevrolet Epica 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 179 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 232 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Toyota Camry engine produces 38 HP more power than Chevrolet Epica, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Chevrolet Epica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.2 | |
|
The Chevrolet Epica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Camry consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Epica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Camry could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Camry engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus ES | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Camry might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Camry 2009 2.5 engine: The 2.5-liter 2AR-FE engine replaced the earlier 2.4-liter AZ series and is widely regarded as a highly reliable, long-lasting engine, often referred to as a "million-kms" motor. However, it requires ... More about Toyota Camry 2009 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Camry is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Epica, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Camry is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Epica has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Camry has 70 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Epica. This could mean that the Toyota Camry uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Camry is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Epica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Camry has
|
Chevrolet Epica has
| |