Toyota Camry 2017 vs Opel Omega 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Camry is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Camry engine produces 6 HP more power than Opel Omega, but torque is 4 NM less than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power Toyota Camry reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Camry) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 127 mm (5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Omega can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Omega version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Toyota Camry 2017 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota Camry 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Toyota Camry is 2 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Camry is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 493 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 830 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. Toyota Camry has 37 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Camry is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Omega, which means Toyota Camry can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`030 kg | 2`080 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`570 kg | 1`535 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 460 kg | 545 kg | |
| Toyota Camry load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Opel Omega. Therefore, Opel Omega is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Camry has
|
Opel Omega has
| |