Toyota Camry 2001 vs Volvo 850 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.0 | 2.3 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 - 186 HP | 140 - 226 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 - 273 NM | 206 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 10.5 seconds | 7.4 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 11.0 | 9.1 - 9.7 | |
|
Toyota Camry petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo 850. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Toyota Camry is larger. Toyota Camry is 16 cm longer than the Volvo 850, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Camry is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 445 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Camry is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volvo 850, which means Toyota Camry can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 850 has
| |