Toyota Camry 2017 vs Kia Ceed 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Toyota Camry is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Kia Ceed has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 (petrol, hybrid) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Kia Ceed is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 249 HP | 60 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 199 - 356 NM | 134 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 10.4 seconds | 9.1 - 12.9 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Camry are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Kia Ceed. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.7 | 1.5 - 6.4 | |
|
Toyota Camry petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Ceed. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Toyota Camry is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Camry is 29 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Camry is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 493 litres | 625 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1694 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Camry uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Camry is 0.8 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means Toyota Camry can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`053 kg | ~ 1`892 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`572 kg | ~ 1`334 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 481 kg | ~ 558 kg | |
| Toyota Camry load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Kia Ceed. Therefore, Kia Ceed is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Camry has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |