Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Toyota Yaris 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 6 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2009 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Yaris 2009 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 313 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Suzuki Swift has 109 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Suzuki Swift uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |