Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 4 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Honda Jazz. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 5 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 428 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1396 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 224 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |