Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
512 litres | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Suzuki Swift uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 400 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Suzuki Swift can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`480 kg | 1`290 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |