Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 4 HP more power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Honda Jazz. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Jazz is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 5 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
512 litres | 883 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 126 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 371 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |