Suzuki Swift 2006 vs Toyota Yaris 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Yaris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 198 litres | 313 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 115 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |