Suzuki Swift 2006 vs Nissan Micra 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan Micra, but torque is 12 NM less than Nissan Micra. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Note, Nissan Cube | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 198 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | 584 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`475 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |