Suzuki Swift 2006 vs Mini Cooper 2007

 
Suzuki Swift
2006 - 2010
Mini Cooper
2007 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 92 HP120 HP
Torque: 116 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds9.1 seconds
Mini Cooper is a more dynamic driving.
Suzuki Swift engine produces 28 HP less power than Mini Cooper, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Mini Cooper. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.35.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.8 l/100km
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 75 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway860 km on highway
680 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Engine production duration: 19 years4 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki JimnyUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mini Cooper engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 3.70 m3.70 m
Width: 1.69 m1.68 m
Height: 1.54 m1.41 m
Suzuki Swift and Mini Cooper are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 198 litres160 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
562 litres680 litres
Suzuki Swift has 38 litres more trunk space than the Mini Cooper. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Cooper (by 118 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.4 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.3 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4851`500
Safety:
Quality:
low

high
Mini Cooper has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mini Cooper, so Mini Cooper quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 24004000
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Swift has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mini Cooper has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv