Suzuki Swift 2006 vs Citroen C2 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 33 HP less power than Citroen C2, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Citroen C2. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 198 litres | 166 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | 879 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 32 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 317 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 1.3 metres less than that of the Citroen C2, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`415 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |