Suzuki Swift 2006 vs Citroen C2 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 61 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 94 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift engine produces 31 HP more power than Citroen C2, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Citroen C2. Thanks to more power Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 206 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 198 litres | 166 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | 879 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 32 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 317 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |