Suzuki Swift 2006 vs Citroen C2 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 17 HP more power than Citroen C2, but torque is 2 NM less than Citroen C2. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger. Suzuki Swift is 3 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 198 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | 879 litres | |
| Suzuki Swift has 5 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C2 (by 317 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`362 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C2 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |