Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, but torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine: Engines with higher mileage tend to lose oil both through combustion and leaks, with consumption becoming noticeable past 150,000 km. Around the same time, the timing chain may stretch as the hydraulic ... More about Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 10 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 275 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Suzuki Swift has 71 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Suzuki Swift uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |