Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Suzuki Splash 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Swift and Suzuki Splash have the same engine power, but Suzuki Swift torque is 4 NM more than Suzuki Splash. Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Splash engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Used also on Opel Agila | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Suzuki Swift is larger, but lower. Suzuki Swift is 14 cm longer than the Suzuki Splash, 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Swift has 26 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Suzuki Splash has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Suzuki Splash, so Suzuki Splash quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |