Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Toyota Yaris 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Yaris 2011 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 286 litres | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 82 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`470 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Toyota Yaris scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |