Suzuki Swift 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Suzuki Swift engine produces 5 HP less power than Honda Jazz, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Honda Jazz. Despite less power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz, which means that by driving the Suzuki Swift over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda Jazz 2011 1.3 engine: The Honda L13A is a small 1.3-liter engine with an i-VTEC 16-valve design, known for its exceptional durability. It uses a timing chain and is widely regarded as one of the most reliable engines in its class. With proper maintenance, it ... More about Honda Jazz 2011 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 5 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 204 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 883 litres | |
|
Honda Jazz has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 133 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`535 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda Jazz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Swift has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda Jazz, so Honda Jazz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |