Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Mini Cooper 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 42 HP less power than Mini Cooper, whereas torque is 82 NM less than Mini Cooper. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Swift can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.41 m | |
| Suzuki Swift is 3 cm longer than the Mini Cooper, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Swift is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
528 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`595 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Cooper has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mini Cooper has
| |