Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Mini Cooper S 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper S is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 98 HP less power than Mini Cooper S, whereas torque is 162 NM less than Mini Cooper S. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper S. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mini Cooper S engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.41 m | |
| Suzuki Swift and Mini Cooper S are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
528 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper S, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`560 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 20 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Mini Cooper S has
| |