Suzuki Swift 2013 vs Nissan Note 2012

 
Suzuki Swift
2013 - 2017
Nissan Note
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.2 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 94 HP98 HP
Torque: 118 NM147 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.5 seconds12.2 seconds
Nissan Note is a more dynamic driving.
Suzuki Swift engine produces 4 HP less power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Nissan Note. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km6.9 l/100km
By specification Suzuki Swift consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Swift could require 60 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Swift consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note.

Dimensions

Length: 3.85 m4.10 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.51 m1.53 m
Suzuki Swift is 25 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Swift is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 211 litres325 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
528 litres1495 litres
Nissan Note has more luggage space.
Suzuki Swift has 114 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Note. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 967 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Note.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4801`510
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Nissan Note has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Note quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): no data5600
Pros and Cons:
    Nissan Note has
    • more dynamic
    • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv